CHAPTERS TWO AND THREE from Reality Revealed, The Theory of Multidimensional Reality:

By Douglas Vogt and Gary Sultan

Vector Associates, 11250 Old St Augustine Rd., #15, Suite 133, Jacksonville, FL 32257; Sales@vectorpub.com

Nikola Tesla

 

It is very rare in history that one man can affect the lives of so many of his fellow man; there have only been two such men, in our judgment during the last one thousand years.  The first was Sir Isaac Newton, the father of classical mechanics and one of the principal developers of calculus.1 The other is Nikola Tesla.  The time span of his work covered from the early 1880’s to 1943, when he died a poor man.  Many scientists were very jealous of him because of his unmatched insight and scientific ability.  He did not believe that Einstein’s Theory of Relativity was in any way correct.

He said, during a speech to the Institute of Immigrant Welfare (May 12, 1938): “There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment.” At other times, he also stated, “Atomic power is an illusion.” (1-p250) He felt this because during his experiments using currents of several million volts, he stated that he had smashed untold billions of atoms without having any

1The other was a German mathematician by the name of Baron Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibnitz who also discovered calculus at about the same time as Newton, but independently.

21

thermal nuclear reaction or any emission of energy coming from these experiments.  He said, principally something very similar to what we theorize.  He envisioned this energy to be similar to the old theory of the existence of the “ether.” (The “ether” theory is discussed in the chapter on magnetism.) Although he never visual­ized existence the way we theorize it, he had experimented and worked long enough with high voltage and high frequency devices to intuitively know that there was something interrelated with mat­ter that gave it its energy.  We are not saying that we believe in any way in the “ether” theory; we just wish to point out that many great minds in science intuitively felt there was something inter­related with matter that could not be seen or readily detected.

Since Tesla believed in the “ether” theory, after 1905, when Einstein’s special theory of relativity was published, the scientific community began to ignore him, not giving him credit for many of his inventions and theoretical discoveries.  When Einstein published his general theory of relativity, Tesla still insisted that Einstein was totally wrong and that Einstein’s gravitational field theory was also completely wrong. (Tesla had his own theory of gravitation but never published it for reasons unknown.) At this time, Tesla had most of academia, including all the well-known physicists and scientists, against him.  The harsh consequence of Tesla’s rejection of the theory of relativity was that he was “written out” of most of the textbooks and scientific journals of the day.  So, by the 1930s, Tesla was unknown except to a very few.

He was relegated to a life of obscurity so that the major physi­cists of academia could develop Einstein’s theory of relativity, especially his general theory, without the impeccable logic of Nikola Tesla, constantly criticizing and blatantly informing them that their great idea wasn’t worth the paper on which it was printed.  Combined with the fact that Tesla had made most of the major discoveries of the early part of the 20th century, years be­fore other scientists, this also instilled jealousy.  These scientists did not want it well known that their work was merely a continua­tion, or rediscovery, of Tesla’s done many years earlier.  Few peo­ple were interested in giving Tesla the credit he so richly deserved.

It is not only our opinion that Tesla was a great scientific genius.  The famous English scientist, Baron William Kelvin stated: “Tesla has contributed more to electrical science than any man up to his time.” (1-pl07) Another accolade was given by Mr. B. A. Behrend,

22

Chairman of the Edison Medal Committee, American Institute of

Electrical Engineers, during that Institute’s presentation of the

Edison Medal to Tesla in 1917.  He said:

“The due appreciation or even enumeration of the results of Mr. Tesla’s invention is neither practicable nor desirable at this moment.  There is a time for all things.  Suffice it to say that, were we to seize and eliminate from our industrial world the results of Mr. Tesla’s work, the wheels of industry would cease to turn, our electric cars and trains would stop, our towns would be dark, our mills would be dead and idle.  Yes, so far reaching is this work, that it has become the warp and woof of industry. . . . His name marks an epoch in the advance of electrical science.  From that work has sprung a revolution in the electrical art.” (1-p236)

The best way to understand why Tesla was so great is to know what he invented and what his theoretical discoveries were.  Listed below are just some of the more important of his discoveries.  All of these discoveries and concepts were first discovered by him from 3 to 80 years before anyone else.  Many scientists received credit for these discoveries without giving Tesla any credit at all.

Year                                           Theoretical Discoveries

 

1890           The concept of tuned coils and tuned circuits on which all present-day electronics is based.

 

1890           That high frequency currents produce heat in the human body and other objects.  There is a wide range of applica­tions from this principle, one of which is our present-day microwave oven.

 

1892           The concept of a worldwide broadcasting system using his wireless communications system, which included the prin­ciples of tuned circuits, a ground connection, and antenna.  This system, he said, would enable the transmitting of Morse code, voice, electric power, and eventually, pictures all over the world.

 

1880s         Everything in the universe operated on the principle of vibrations similar to alternating current.

 

1899           That the earth is a good conductor of electricity, along with the upper atmosphere.

 

23

1899        That the earth is filled with a tremendous amount of elec­trical potential that could be tapped for energy.  Also, since the upper atmosphere is a good conductor of electricity, and the lower, more dense atmosphere acted as an insulator, the earth could be considered like a large capacitor. (This idea is a very important one, covered in depth in the sec­tion on gravity.)

 

1892        That the sun worked on the same principle as his one-wire, high-frequency incandescent lamp.  He stated that the sun is like an incandescent body that carried a high voltage charge, which would in turn emit large showers of small particles into space at high velocities carrying a large charge. (This idea is covered in greater depth in our chapter on astronomy.)

 

1892        The conclusion from the previous discovery, brought him to the original discovery of cosmic rays.  He correctly theo­rized that they travel at tremendous velocities carrying great amounts of potential.  He also theorized correctly that outer space is filled with these particles from our sun and from other stars in our galaxy; that the earth is con­stantly bombarded by these particles.  He also said that when these particles hit other atoms, the atoms would shatter into pieces.  He theorized that the aurora borealis is caused by these particles from the sun.

 

1896        After Henri Becquerel (a French physicist) discovered that “ mysterious rays” were emitted from uranium, Tesla gave his own theory of what caused this radioactivity.  He said that cosmic rays would cause this radioactivity in other elements, if they were permitted to bombard the element.  The scientific community did not believe him until 30 years later, when Doctor Robert Millikan rediscovered these rays, with all the results Tesla predicted.  Tesla re­ceived no credit for his work.

 

1892        He was the first to discover the existence of electrons.  He referred to them as “electrically charged atoms.”

 

1898        He was the first to envision electronic computers.  He called

 

24

them “telautomates.” He felt they would “ultimately be capable of acting as if possessed of their own intelligence and their advent will create a revolution.”

Year                            Inventions

1880s Various types of improved direct current, dynamos, and

motors.

1888        The polyphase, alternating current dynamo.

 

1888        The rotating magnetic field.

 

1888        Various alternating current motors.

 

1890        Various tuned circuits.

 

1890        The first glass electronic vacuum tube for detecting electro­magnetic waves.

 

1890        The electric transformer or induction coil (the Tesla coil).

1891        Various types of voltage regulators for high voltage, high frequency currents.

1891        Fluorescent lighting.

1891        Neon bulbs.

1891        A one-wire incandescent button lamp, which produced 20 times more light than the regular incandescent light bulb.

1893        A description of the devices for his wireless communica­tions system.  The forerunner of the radio.

 

1891-       An atom smasher, more efficient and light-weight than any

1892        in present use today.  He called it his “molecular bombard­ment lamp.”

 

1892        An electron microscope with one million x plus magnifica­tion.

 

1896-       Very efficient gas and steam turbines.

1897

25

1897     First radio transmission of intelligent information using tuned circuits, the same principle we use today in our radios.

 

1898        A remote-controlled wireless guidance system for boats and land vehicles.

1899        The first man ever to produce 135 million volts of power.

1899        An apparatus for transmitting electrical energy without wires anywhere in the world.  This method transmitted the energy through the earth.

 

1934     The invention of the laser.

This last invention requires a special explanation. In Tesla’s later life, he was very close-mouthed about what he had discovered, be­cause so many people had stolen his ideas, causing great distrust of everyone.  An excellent book on the life of Tesla is Prodigal Genius by John J. O’Neill.  Mr. O’Neill was a personal friend of Tesla’s from about the 30’s until Tesla’s death.  Although Mr. O’Neill was an ardent fan of Tesla’s, he was not told what this last invention was.  Tesla merely gave everyone clues of what he could do with it.  He intended that this system be used to transmit tremendous amounts of power over long distances.  He referred to this inven­tion as a “death ray” (1934).  On July 24, 1934, New York City, Tesla said that the following are some of the things that this sys­tem could do:

“Still another item which has interested me is a report from Washington in the World Telegram of July 13, 1934, to the effect that scientists doubt the death ray effects.  I am quite in agreement with these doubt­ers and probably more pessimistic in this respect than anybody else, for I speak from long experience.

Rays of the requisite energy cannot be produced, and, then again, their intensity diminishes with the square of the distance.  Not so the agent I employ, which will enable us to transmit to a distant point more energy than is possible by any other kind or ray.

We are all fallible, but as I examine the subject in the light of my present theoretical and experimental knowledge I am filled with deep convictions that I am giving to the world something far beyond the wildest dreams of inventors of all time.” (1-p241)

26

On another occasion he said that energy could be transmitted by a ray or beam of infinitesimally small cross section, one hundred thousandth of a centimeter in diameter.

On his birthday in 1938, he said that he could also use this death ray for interplanetary communication.  He said he was able to produce, in the dark region of the thin crescent new moon, an incandescent spot that would glow like a brilliant star so that it could be seen without the aid of a telescope.  He also stated later that this beam had a straight-line trajectory.

There is no doubt from the previous descriptions that Tesla had, indeed, invented the laser, decades before anyone else.

There was a funny result from one of the vibration experiments he was doing in 1896; the ramifications go far beyond anything that even Tesla had suspected.  He was doing a simple vibration experiment in his Houston Street laboratory in New York City.  It was a small oscillator that was big enough to be slipped into one’s pocket.  This mechanical oscillator was driven by an air compressor.  The air moved a reciprocating piston through an electric coil.  In this particular experiment, he attached this oscillator firmly to one of the center beams in his laboratory.  His laboratory was on one of the upper floors.  As the oscillator started up and increased its vibrations, it transmitted these oscillations through the building to the foundation.  As the oscillations increased, an earthquake was formed in a one-mile radius from his laboratory.  Over a period of a few minutes, the shaking became so great that windows shattered, plumbing pipes broke, plaster fell from ceilings, build­ings shook.  Eventually, the oscillations reached the resonnant frequency of his building, which began shaking violently.  Once Tesla realized that his oscillator was causing the building to shake, he destroyed the oscillator and the earthquake stopped immedi­ately.  The building had shaken so badly that if Tesla had not stopped his machine, the building would have collapsed.

The phenomenon here, which no one realized at the time, is how a piston that doesn’t even weigh a pound can be able to develop enough force to generate an earthquake of at least four on the Richter scale.  It is obvious that the oscillator could not have done it in this dimension.  According to our theory of multi­dimensional reality, the reason the oscillator was able to do so much damage was because it was not just oscillating itself in this dimension but it was also oscillating the information that made it

27

up in the diehold.  When the oscillator produced the frequency (a lower harmonic) that correlated with the frequency of the infor­mation that made up that piston, it raised the potential of that information.  The domains of information started to overlap affect­ing the information that made up other objects in its vicinity.  The result, in this dimension, was that the piston caused the earth and the other buildings to oscillate.  In reality, these objects were being made to oscillate in the diehold, where all their information was in the same locality, thereby causing the earthquake.

The one lesson to be learned from Tesla’s work and theories is that, if you correctly know how even a small part of existence functions, you will be able to make tremendous advancements in all fields of physics.

REFERENCES

1.             O’Neill, John J., “Prodigal Genius; The Life of Nikola Tesla,” (N.Y., Ives Washburn, Inc., 1944).

 

 

Bibliography

Martin, T. C., The Inventions, Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla.  N.Y.: The Electrical Engineer, 1894.

Popovic, V.; et. al.: Nikola Tesla; Lectures, Patents, Articles.  Beograd, Nikola Tesla Museum, 1966.

28

CHAPTER THREE:

Magnetism and Gravity

For thousands of years, man has wondered about magnetism and gravity.  When the first man discovered the first piece of magnetite (lodestone), he must have marveled at the great magic and mystery that made that piece of magnitite point in only one direction.  Many thousands of years have passed since that first discovery; yet magnetism and gravity have still defied man’s understanding.  Man has advanced scientifically, but not quite far enough to reason out the most basic ingredient of his existence.  If the foundation of our science is incomplete, then the theories, assumptions, and laws that follow will also be incomplete.  This condition will not last forever because eventually science comes to a dead-end.  This hap­pens when the powers of observation catch up to and surpass the ability to explain the observations in the framework of the old philosophy.  Man has come to this stage in his development, and he is seeing things in the fields of astronomy and nuclear physics that just can’t be explained by using Einstein’s theory of relativity and field theory.

The subject of gravity was first quantified by Sir Isaac Newton. Newton looked at gravity as one of many possible forces of nature.

29

He considered inertia as the fundamental part of nature, thus it was far more important to classical mechanics than gravity or mag­netism.  Classical mechanics worked well as long as the relative speeds between two objects were not too great.  Astronomers were able to approximate the speeds and distances of planets using Newton’s theories.  Engineers were able to design machines and buildings using classical mechanics and found it worked well.  Then came electricity, which moved at the speed of light (depending on the medium), and classical mechanics started to fall apart.  Men like Michael Faraday, Denis Poisson, Karl Gauss, Wilhelm Weber, James Maxwell, and later Nikola Tesla experimented with elec­tricity and dynamos observing that there was an interrelationship between current and magnetism.  This magnetic field encircled a conductor and was propagated perpendicular to the flow of cur­rent.  It was also observed that a conductor passing perpendicular to a magnetic field would develop a current to be induced through the wire.  Yet, none of the scientists could explain why a magnetic field could induce such a current.  Before Maxwell, scientists en­visioned magnetism as a fluid in the ether.  This fluid collected at the ends of an iron bar when it was “magnetized.” Through the works of Weber and Poisson, it was then visualized as “magnetic matter” that was strictly confined to the molecules.  These mole­cules were always magnetized inside the iron bar, but they were randomly arranged.  When the bar was magnetized, by using another magnetic or electric coil, these magnetic molecules lined up, there­by creating a magnet.  This is similar to what is envisioned today. (4-p79)

Next we will go into the examples Maxwell used to develop his elementary theory of magnetism and electromagnetism.  We will first describe the observation or the traditional explanation.  We will then give our explanation using the theory of multidimensional reality.  The reason we must cover this material is because Einstein, in 1905, referred in his special theory of relativity to Maxwell and Lorentz’s theory of electromagnetic phenomena.  He said, “Thus all facts of experience which support the electromagnetic theory also support the theory of relativity.” (1-p49) Therefore, if Max­well was wrong in his conclusions, then Einstein’s theory of rela­tivity is in big trouble.  When the early scientists were investigating magnetism and gravity, they were faced with a basic problem.  They could see the effects of magnetism, but they could not see what

30

caused those effects.  So what developed was that they had to try to recreate magnetic fields.  They were able to do so by using electric current through a conductor; the effect is called electro­magnetism.  The logic was that if you could duplicate the magnetic field and vary its intensity, you could then get some insight as to what regular magnetism is and, maybe, finally, gravity.  We will first cover bar magnets and what forms the magnetic field.  This is not the order that Maxwell used because scientists could not understand where this field came from.  Maxwell said:

“The action of magnets at a distance is perfectly identical with that of electric currents.  We therefore endeavour to trace both to the same cause, and since we cannot explain electric currents by means of mag­nets, we must adopt the other alternative, and explain magnets by means of molecular electric currents.” (4-p275)

So as we can see, he started out with the wrong assumption, thereby making his conclusions destined to be wrong.

Bar Magnets

Traditional explanation-(Weber’s theory)

“Weber’s theory differs from this in assuming that the molecules of the iron are always magnets, even before the application of the magnetizing force, but that in ordinary iron the magnetic axes of the molecules are turned indifferently in every direction, so that the iron as a whole ex­hibits no magnetic properties.” (4-p79) (Figure 3.1)

UNMAGNETIZED IRON BAR                                            MAGNETIZED IRON BAR

Figure 3.1 Drawing of a magnetized bar and a nonmagnetized bar

It was also concluded later that there were two different kinds of magnetism: one caused by the freely moving particles in electricity, while the other type was non-freely moving magnetized particles

31

which were separated by a small distance.  If these molecules were forced to line up, they would form a bar magnet.

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

The first question to be asked is how many elements can be mag­netized? The answer is: only one, the element iron.  If Weber’s theory was completely correct, then it must be assumed that all materials can be made into magnets.  In fact, there are only three other elements that will even be attracted by a magnetic field: oxygen (the second strongest element), sodium and aluminum-to a much lesser degree. (2-p354) So we must conclude that there is something very special about iron for it to become a magnet.  What it is, is that the frequency of the information that makes up iron is a close harmonic to the carrier wave frequency.

What happens when you force the atoms of iron to line up? We are forcing the information that makes it up to modulate in pre­dominantly two directions (180’ out of phase).  Normally, the signal would modulate 360’ around the object; but when we “magnetize” it, we have rearranged the information in the die­hold to be directed toward the poles.

The Relationship of North and South Poles

Traditional explanation-Since each molecule has its own north and south poles which form chains of molecules within the magnet, the reason that molecules A and B (Figure 3.1) are not repelled away from each other, within the magnet, is because these con­nected chains of magnetic dipole molecules compensate each other in the interior but end up as opposite poles at the ends. (3-pl69)

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

The reason opposite poles attract is because those two parts of the information frequency are 180’ out of phase.  Therefore, they can occupy the same time and space.  When these two fre­quencies combine they form the information that makes up that

32

 

iron molecule or magnet.  Therefore, they are attracted together because the coordinates for their modulation are in the same time and space.

The reason like poles repel each other is that these two fre­quencies are the same information.  Therefore, they are in phase with each other and cannot occupy the same time and space, thus formulating another rule of the diehold: the diehold must keep like domains of information from occupying the same time and space, or else a “tear” might develop in that part of the universe, rendering that segment unstable.

Alterations of a Magnetic Bar

The permanent magnetism of an iron bar increases when it is extended and diminishes when it is compressed. (4-p92) There is no traditional explanation for this phenomenon.

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

When the magnetic bar is at rest, there is a fixed amount of information directed at the two ends.  This amount of information remains constant as long as the mass of the bar remains the same.  The field strength of its information is proportional to the amount of area of the two ends.  As the bar is mechanically extended, the mass of the bar remains constant, but the area of the ends becomes smaller.  If the ends become smaller, the same amount of informa­tion must be directed through a smaller area.  The result is that the field intensity becomes greater.  When the bar magnet is compressed, the reverse happens.  The area of the ends becomes greater, so the same amount of information is directed through a larger opening thereby decreasing the intensity.

The same effect is found when an iron bar is placed in the center of an electrical coil.  The iron bar becomes lengthened when the current passes through the coil setting up a magnetic field as illus­trated (Figure 3.2). The effect of this is that the information that makes up the bar is even more restricted to only two paths.  The information that might have been directed toward the middle of the bar can now enter only through the ends.  This increases the intensity of the field at the ends.  This, combined with the mag-

33

ELECTRIC COIL

MAGNETIC FIELD

IRON BAR

 

 

Figure 3.2 Iron bar in a coil

 

 

netic field of the coil concentrated along the center, focuses the information of the bar to a smaller area thereby forcing the bar to elongate.

Electromagnetism

One of the first observations made by scientists was that if a cur­rent is passed through a wire, a magnetic field appears perpendicu­lar to the flow of current.  The magnetic field strength is propor­tional to the amount of current passing through the wire.  This magnetic field is thought by scientists to be a state of stress in the conductor.  To quote Maxwell:

“In explaining the electromagnetic force by means of a state of stress in a medium, we are only following out the conception of Faraday, that the lines of magnetic force tend to shorten themselves, and that they repel each other when placed side by side.  All that we have done is to express the value of the tension along the lines, and the pressure at right angles to them, in mathematical language, and to prove that the state of stress thus assumed to exist in the medium will actually produce the observed forces on the conductors which carry electric currents.

We have asserted nothing as yet with respect to the mode in which this state of stress is originated and maintained in the medium.  We have

34

merely shown that it is possible to conceive the mutual action of elec­tric currents to depend on a particular kind of stress in the surrounding medium instead of being a direct and immediate action at a distance.” (4-p282)

Faraday also discovered that the current traveled along the surface of the wire; and the interior remained relatively free.  It was also discovered that the speed of the current was the speed of light.  The French physicist, Andre Ampere theorized that magnetism was to be explained by the means of electric currents.  These cur­rents must circulate within molecules of a magnet similar to the current passing through a wire.  This led scientists to the idea that magnetism is an effect of moving electrons.  Maxwell continued the mistake by concluding that a displacement current, just like a con­duction current, produces a magnetic field.

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

We must ask ourselves the first most important question.  What comes first, the magnetic field or the current? The answer is the magnetic field because per our theory, the magnetic field is the information that makes up that object.  Therefore, in order for the electrons to exist, the information must first be present to form their existence.  This theory is proved by the phenomenon of a back electromotive force-also known as self-inductance-that is present in a coil when the current is switched on (Figure 3.3).

The delay in the current from reaching maximum is due to the fact that the information that makes up the electrons must first be modulated into existence.  This self-inductance or magnetic field of the copper wire does not come from the copper, since copper cannot itself become a magnet.  In fact, it is repelled by a strong magnetic field.  Since we have come to the realization that the back electromotive force is due to the information that makes up the electrons, then we would expect that the increase and decay of current density would be an exponential function of time.  It is a well-proven fact that these are exponential functions, just like the charging and discharging of capacitors.

The next observation to be covered is why does the magnetic field appear perpendicular to the flow of current? This is because

 

·         33

 

 

EL is the magnetic field formed in the coil, in the opposite direction to the flow of current.  ER and I is the resistance in ohms and the current density.  This graph also describes a capacitor charging up.

Figure 3.3 Graph depicting the charging of a capacitor

the magnetic field is 90’ out of phase from the electric charge.  In other words, the magnetic field cannot exist at the same time and space as the electrical charge.  This means that at one small moment of time, just the magnetic field exists by itself.  In the next moment of time, only the electrical charge exists.  We theorize this fre­quency is to be found between 1,500 and 3,000 GHz (billions of cycles per second) or just under the infrared frequency.

The next point to be explained is why the electric current flows only along the surface of the conductor.  The reason is because the surface of the wire is where the actual edge of the domains of information exist for the wire.  On the surface is where the greatest magnetic intensity or information modulation of the signal exists, thereby causing the greatest amounts of surface potential, even without any external current added.  This idea will be further proved in the chapter on light.

36

The reason why electric current travels at the speed of light (depending on the medium) is because the information that makes up that electron is passing us at the speed of light (2.997925 x 10^10 cm/sec.). Another way of saying this is that the electron is really stationary domains of potential on the tape.  As the tape head passes the information that makes us up, it passes these domains of potential at the speed of light.

The Electric Generator (The Dynamo)

Avoltage is induced in a conductor, passing perpendicular to a magnetic field (Figure 3.4).

MAGNET

s

MAGNETIC FIELD

FLOW OF CURRENT

N

 

Figure 3.4 Drawing of a wire passing a magnetic field

 

Traditional explanation-The magnetic field produces stress within the conductor, which forces the electrons in the outer ring of the atoms to move in a certain direction.  They never explained why this stress could cause this effect.

The conclusion of all this is that they don’t know why a voltage is formed in a dynamo.  They could not give a logical explanation for this phenomenon, so they just went ahead and built bigger and better generators.  What they should have done was reflect, and think, logically, what is so special about a magnetic field that it

37

can do this? If they did spend time and think about it, they might have come up with one of the most important secrets of the universe.

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

Per our theory, whenever the information of any two objects pass themselves at great enough velocity, electrons will be created.  If the two objects are conductors, the electric charge will conduct along the wire.  If the electrons are formed by two non-conductors, they will form what we call static electricity.

The generator works in the following manner (Figure 3.5). This explanation is very important to the chapter on Kirlian photog­raphy.

Position A-As we observe it in this dimension, first the con­ductor is moving parallel to the magnetic field, not crossing any of the magnetic lines of information of the magnet.  The result is that no electrons are being formed.

Position B-The information that makes up the conductor is starting to cross the information that makes up the magnet.  A voltage is beginning to be formed in the conductor.

Position C-At this point, the conductor is passing perpendicular to the information that makes up the magnet.  It is passing the greatest number of lines of information on the magnet.  So the greatest amount of electrons are being formed on or near the sur­face of the conductor.  These electrons pass onto the conductor and travel to areas of less concentration of potential.  How the electrons are formed in the first dimension will be discussed a little later.

Position D-At this point, the conductor is passing less lines of information perpendicular to itself; so less electrons are being formed.

Position E-The conductor is now passing parallel to the infor­mation of the magnetic, so no lines of information are being crossed; thereby creating no electrons.

Positions F, G, & H-are similar to B, C, and D except the elec­trons flow in the opposite direction.

Getting back to Position C, where the maximum quantity of electrons are being formed, the question we must ask ourselves: Is

38

 

 

Top figure describes the action of a wire conductor as it revolves in a magnetic field inside a generator.  The voltage produced by such action is represented in the graph of the lower figure.

Figure 3.5

what happens in the diehold to form an electron in this dimension? To do this, we must observe what is happening when the conductor is exactly perpendicular to the magnetic field (Figure 3.6). At this position, we can say that both the magnet and the conductor are parallel and closest to each other.  The conductor is usually copper wire because of its low resistance qualities.  As mentioned earlier,

39

copper cannot become a magnet.  This means that both signals (we could think of them as north and south) (Figure 3.7) are modu­lating to the same space and time to form the wire.  Since these signals would be modulating perpendicular to the surface of the wire, this means that half of the wire’s information would be in phase with the information of the north pole of the magnet.  It would be like having two north poles opposing themselves.  As mentioned earlier in the section on bar magnets, when like infor­mation occupies the same time and space, a tear develops in the diehold.  This tear of unstable information forms small domains of potential, which in our dimension we call an electron having a certain fixed charge.  This collective charge we call voltage.

MAGNET

N

DIRECTION OF MOTION

WIRE CROSS SECTION

Figure 3.6 Close-up drawing of a wire passing a north pole in a generator

We can now summarize by saying that observed from this di­mension, one of the conditions necessary to form electrons is to have two objects passing parallel to themselves, thereby causing the information of both to be parallel to each other.  The lines of information will always be perpendicular to the plain of motion.

Magnecrystallic Phenomena

This phenomenon was first described by Julius Plucker, (4-p49) then it was further experimented with by Michael Faraday (1848).

40

 

Figure 3.7 Close-up of the copper wire showing the information being directed toward it

 

Faraday was the one to coin the expression “magnecrystallic force.” What this effect is, is that certain crystals will turn on their axes and align themselves perpendicular to a magnetic field.  He worked with crystals of bismuth, antimony, and arsenic.  He found the following: “The direction of the force is in relation to the mag­netic field, axial and not equatorial.” (8-p87)

“I have already stated that the magnecrystallic force does not manifest itself by attraction or repulsion, or, at least, does not cause approach or recession, but gives position only.  The law of action appears to be, that, the line or axis of MAGNECRYSTALLIC force (being the result­ant of the action of all the molecules), tends to place itself parallel, or as a tangent, to the magnetic curve or line of magnetic force, passing through the place where the crystal is situated. (8-p90)

“Thus it is evident that, in all these cases, there was a line of magne­crystallic force perpendicular to the planes of the plates, and perfectly consistent in its position and action with the force before found in the solid crystals of antimony. (8-pl02)

“Thus it seems that other bodies besides bismuth, antimony and arsenic, present magnecrystallic effects.  Amongst these are the allow of iridium and osmium, probably tellurium and titanium, and certainly the sul­phates of iron and nickel. (8-pll0)

“The magnecrystallic force appears to be very clearly distinguished from either the magnetic or diamagnetic forces, in that it causes neither approach nor recession; consisting not in attraction or repulsion, but in its giving a certain determinate position to the mass under its influence,

41

so that a given line in relation to the mass is brought by it into a given relation with the direction of the external magnetic power. (8-pll00)

“This force appears to me to be very strange and striking in its char­acter.  It is not polar, for there is no attraction or repulsion.  Then what is the nature of the mechanical force which turns the crystal round, or makes it affect a magnet? It is not like a turning helix of wire acted on by the lines of magnetic force for there, there is a current of electricity required, and the ring has polarity all the time and is powerfully at­tracted or repelled. (8-pl2l)

“If we suppose for a moment that the axial position is that in which the crystal is unaffected, and that it is in the oblique position that the magnecrystallic axial direction is affected and rendered polar, giving two tensions pulling the crystal round, then there ought to be attrac­tions at these times, and an obliquely presented crystal ought to be attracted by a single pole, or the nearest of two poles; but no action of this kind appears.

“Or we might suppose that the crystal is a little more apt for magnetic induction, or a little less apt for diamagnetic induction, in the direction of the magnecrystallic axis than in other directions.  But, if so, it should surely show polar attractions in the case of the magnetic bodies, as sul­phate of iron; and in the case of diamagnetic bodies, as bismuth, a difference in the degree of repulsion when presented with the magne­crystallic axis parallel and perpendicular to the lines of magnetic force; which it does not do.

“I do not remember heretofore such a case of force as the present one, where a body is brought into position only, without attraction or repulsion.

“If the power be induced, it must be like, generally, to its inducing predominants: and these are, at present, the magnetic and electric forces.  If induced, subject to the crystalline force it must show an intimate relation between it and them.  How hopeful we may be, there­fore, that the results will help to throw open the doors which may lead us to a full knowledge of these powers and the combined manner in which they dwell in the particles of matter, and exert their influence in producing the wonderful phenomena which they present!” (8-pl22)

Maxwell and other scientists after him never gave a reason why this phenomenon occurs.  It is obvious that Faraday knew he was dealing with something he could not explain by using his theories.  After Maxwell, it doesn’t appear to have been mentioned by any­one, not even by Einstein.  This is because his theory of relativity

42

has no explanation for the aligning of objects to a magnetic field with no attraction or repulsion.

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

Why do only a few elements like arsenic, bismuth, and antimony exhibit this magnecrystallic effect? The answer is that since each element has its own frequency that makes it up, of all the elements, some will have a frequency which will not be a higher or lower harmonic of the frequency of the magnetic field.  But its frequency or information will modulate in such a way as to let the informa­tion of the magnet pass parallel to the element’s information, thereby turning in the direction of the magnetic field.

It seems that when the scientists of Einstein’s day came across this phenomenon and realized they could not explain it by using the ether or the special or general theories of relativity, they stayed away from it like the plague.  Scientists are paid by benefactors to come up with answers, not more questions.  Einstein and the other scientists who worked with him to develop and push the theory of relativity, truly thought they had the truth and the secret of the universe.  The problem is that when you have a theory for the secret of the universe, your theory must explain all phenomena, not just the ones with which you feel confident.

The results from scientists like Maxwell, prior to 1905, was that they knew what the effects of magnetism were on other objects­that magnetism was interrelated with electricity, that it was similar to gravity and the magnetic field of the earth.  They had, also, de­veloped a system of measuring and quantifying the magnetic field.  Field strength could then be expressed in usable terms, like a gauss,” a “weber,” a “tesla,” or a “dyne.”

In summary, Maxwell’s field theory concluded that the magnetic field is something real, that an electrical field is produced by a changing magnetic field, and that a magnetic field is produced by a changing electric field.  His equations describe the structure of the electromagnetic field and its speed.  As mentioned earlier, he did not try to explain how the electromagnetic or magnetic field originated, or from where and how it was maintained in our dimension.

43

Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity

In 1905 Einstein published his Special Theory of Relativity.  Its purpose was to point out the deficiencies in classical mechanics when dealing with objects that were traveling at great speeds rela­tive to each other.  Another purpose of the theory was to lay the groundwork for his explanation of gravity and its effect on moving objects (general theory of relativity).  We have little disagreement with the effects of great velocity, relative to objects in time, as stated in the Special Theory of Relativity.  We do disagree with the causes of these effects.  This seems to prove an interesting point; that you can have a wrong philosophy but still come up with cor­rect results.  It is similar to the astronomical theories of the medi­eval period, insisted on by the Catholic church; that the earth was the center of the universe.  Astronomers of that day constructed star charts showing the planets and the stars going in strange direc­tions, including radical turns and curves, around the earth.  The interesting thing is that they were able to calculate the locations and directions of these heavenly bodies, even though their basic philosophy was wrong.  The same situation exists with the theory of relativity.

Geometrical Representation

Relativity-The first thing Einstein had to do was define the me­thod of coordinates to be used in his theory.  He rejected the tradi­tional 3-dimensional method used in classical mechanics (length, width, and depth), because it was too rigid and did not account for time.  So he used Hermann Minkowski’s geometrical method of representation in a 4-dimensional “world” (Figure 3.8). All objects that have length, width, depth, and travel in time (velocity) are considered 4-dimensional objects.  This system of coordinates did not take into account the effects near a gravitational field.  In the general theory of relativity, Einstein developed another system of coordinates to express objects near a gravitational field.  This sys­tem of coordinates was merely meant to describe objects moving relative to each other in space.

44

 

Figure 3.8 Drawing of Minkowski’s four-dimensional reality

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

Our first criticism of this method of describing dimensions is that it is too narrow and does not take into account many of the ob­servations we see in the universe.  It is too simplistic and incom­plete, thereby rendering it wrong.  We theorize the most important factor dividing the various dimensions is the amount of potential each object has and how great an area an object occupies as a domain of information in the diehold.  To give an example, let’s compare a man and a rock.  Both have length, width, depth, and are both in the same time reference, since they are both going at the same velocity in space.  Using Minkowski’s geometry, we would say the man and the rock are in the same dimension; but no one would say that the man and the rock are the same kind of exist­ence.  The difference between the rock and the man is the greater amount of potential the man has over the rock.  To prove this point, we can easily register a voltage and a high frequency off the man but we cannot read anything off the rock.  This greater potential is manifested in the fact that the man can perceive his environment and interact with it, whereas the rock cannot per-

45

ceive or interact with its environment.  In fact, it can’t even per­ceive its own existence.

The First Dimension: This dimension is the storage dimension where all information that makes up the universe exists.  All infor­mation that makes up the beginning of time to the end of time.  The first dimension has no length, no width, no depth, and time is truly irrelevant.  This dimension is represented by one of the sides of the octahedron (Chapter 9).  The first dimension is also the dimension reserved for the structure of the diehold.  This means that dimensions 2 through 8 can never reach nor see the diehold, because we cannot go faster than the speed of light, which is the speed of the tapehead across the information making up reality.  This is why we can never go faster than the speed of light, because we can never go as fast or faster than the device transmitting our existence.

The Second Dimension: This is the transmission dimension.  Like radio waves, which are electromagnetic waves, magnetic lines of force are 90’ out of phase from the electrical lines of force.  The difference with the diehold transmission frequencies is that the phase angles are the same as the sides of the diehold, and there are no electric lines of force, just pure information (magnetic lines of force).

The Third Dimension: The lowest form of a modulated signal is this dimension.  Each element has its own frequency which forms unique angles associated with that element’s unique crystal shape (see crystal chapter).  The crystal is the basic building block of all the following dimensions.  This dimension, as personified by a crystal, has length, width, and depth but no potential associated with it.

The Fourth Dimension: The lowest level where life and intelli­gence can be modulated into existence.  All living things, from the amoeba to man, can perceive their own environment.  This level of potential is much greater than the objects of the third dimension.  Within this dimension there is a wide range of potential, the smaller forms of life possessing less potential than the larger, more com­plex forms of life.  This is an important observation, since we can now state another theorem about the diehold: Intelligence may be a result of a given level of potential in the diehold.  As the poten­tial of a life-form increases, it is able to perceive more of the

46

domains of information around itself, thereby recalling, comparing and analyzing greater amounts of information.  This is called intel­ligence.  Average man falls into this dimension.  His limitations are: he can only gather information from this dimension with the five senses he has been given (smell, sight, taste, hearing, and touch).  This is not to say that occasionally some individuals will not ex­hibit some of the abilities of the next dimension.

The Fifth Dimension: In this dimension, an intelligence pos­sesses much more potential than in the previous dimension.  He is able to perceive much more information of his surroundings in the diehold without using the senses of a fourth-dimensional individ­ual.  This subject will be covered later in the chapter on psychic phenomena.  A fifth-dimensional being would also be able to bend the information that makes up three-dimensional objects.  This would include the ability to change the rate of signal modulation of an object, thereby altering its time reference.  This individual would start to perceive the information of objects around him without actually detecting them from his lower senses.

The Sixth Dimension: This individual would be able to move objects in time and space.  Time for him would not mean as much as for the other two previous dimensions, and his potential would be much greater than that of the previous dimension.  This intelli­gence could be in the form of a fourth-dimensional being, or may be able to alter its form to something else.  This intelligence would also be able to recreate three- and some four-dimensional objects.  If a sixth-dimensional being has a fish in his possession, he does not just have that fish in the fourth dimension; he also has the information that makes up that fish contained in the diehold.  This intelligence could then reproduce that fish as many times as he wished.  This does not mean he is creating; because in fact, he is only duplicating what already exists.  This sixth-dimensional being probably perceives most of his surroundings from the diehold and not from his lower senses.  This does not mean that this being does not need third, fourth, and fifth-dimensional objects to survive.  He probably uses them as reference points in those dimensions in order for him to know what his information is doing in the die­hold.

The Seventh Dimension: A planet.  This may seem very strange, but if we are going to think logically, we must account for every-

47

thing we see in the universe as having a function.  To continue this line of thought, a planet has much more potential than any of the previous four dimensions.  Even from observing a planet from the fourth dimension, we know that the earth has many frequencies associated with it.  A planet can be considered like a coil and a condenser containing billions of volts of electricity, some of which is discharged as lightening.  The planet also has two types of fields.  One is a gravitational field and the other is a magnetic field.  It does seem logical to state that this entity perceives a great deal of its existence from the diehold.

The Eighth Dimension: A star.  This dimension was one of the easiest to figure out, because in existence there must be a stage of evolution where an existence can finally go back to where its in­formation started.  A star is the only thing in the universe that collapses upon itself when it becomes a black hole.  When it be­comes a black hole, what is happening is that its information is going to the first dimension, or back to the diehold.  This process probably occurs when it has evolved so far and collected so much potential that it can pull in unlimited amounts of information from its surroundings in the diehold.  This information we would perceive as a tremendous gravitational field.  When the gravitational field (concentrated information) gets too great, the star can no longer exist in any other dimension but the first dimension.

Afourth-dimensional existence may be the lowest level of in­telligent information, and it is very short-lived; but it may be able to know the secret of existence faster than the higher dimensions.  There are many trade-offs to be made in order to obtain certain goals.  The reason a fourth-dimensional being could come to the truth faster is because he knows that when he performs an experi­ment, his mind does not have an effect on the outcome of the experiment.  His conclusion would be that the results of his experi­ments were due entirely to the natural laws of science, not manip­ulated by him.  Because of his helplessness in nature, he is rendered not much more than a spectator of existence.  As you go higher up in the dimensions, an intelligence has a harder time delineating whether he is causing the effects or is merely observing them! Therefore, a trade-off is revealed.  The greater your potential, the higher your dimension, and the longer it takes to come to the truth.  This may be why certain objects exist longer in time than others, because they have to.

48

Propagation of Light

Einstein called his theory “The Special Theory of Relativity,” be­cause he recognized the fact that the speed of light, 2.9979 x 108 meters per second, is the constant of the universe and that nothing could go faster than light.  There were other relativity theories at the time, so the word “special” identified Einstein’s.  He theorized that no matter how fast an object was going, if a beam of light was sent out from that object, the velocity of that light would be the same as for an object at rest.  This idea was a departure from classi­cal mechanics, which believed in the cumulative effect of velocities.  Einstein had no explanation as to what light was at the time he formulated his theory.

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

We have no disagreement with Einstein’s conclusion that light is the constant of the universe, but we do wish to state that the reason the speed of light is the fastest speed obtainable is because light is going at the speed of the tapehead across the information.  This tapehead is transmitting all of existence (information) through­out the universe.  Light will be explained in Chapter 5.

Time In Physics

Time to relativity is interrelated to the distance and velocity an object is going from Point “A” to Point “B.” The time varies with the velocity of the object.  Einstein envisioned time as a much more elastic unit of measure than was defined in classical mechanics.

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

We envision time much like Einstein did, when observed from the fourth dimension; but there is a much more important point to be made about time.  We have all heard that it would take many years for intelligence from another solar system to travel to our planet.  This does not even take into consideration the trip back.  We have

49

all heard theories that these UFO’s must use suspended animation for their space travelers.  This system may work for solar systems that are 5 to 10 light years away, but what about solar systems that are 30,000 to 50,000 light years away? This seems like a tremendous distance, but it is still within our own galaxy.  It is un­likely that a highly advanced civilization would engage in space travel that would mean that their astronauts wouldn’t return with­in a relatively short period of time.  This is because by the time these space travelers returned from a long journey, the purpose of their trip would have been long since forgotten or the information would no longer be needed.  And this does not even take into con­sideration the separation of loved ones and the family problems that would arise.

The question that must be asked is what is so special about time that you can make time and distance irrelevant? If we look at time the way Einstein envisioned it, man will never get out of his own backyard.  These tremendous distances may be how God keeps unevolved beings from contaminating other planets and other solar systems.  It is as though if we don’t evolve to the truth of what existence is, we will never travel in time and space.

This is what time is and how it’s related to the diehold.  Let’s take two planets, A and B, (Figure 3.9) which are one light year away from each other.  Now let’s consider a spacecraft (S) traveling at 50 percent the speed of light (1.5 x 108 m/secs) from planet A to planet B. It will take that spacecraft two years of planet A’s time to reach planet B. If we were in the spacecraft, it would take one year and 267 days.  This is the accepted way of looking at time in relation to distance and speed.  Using the Theory of Multidimen­sional Reality, this is how we would look at the same condition.

 

 

 

Figure 3.9 Description of space travel between planet “A” and planet “B”

50

Let’s say we are looking at a small portion of recording tape which has the information of planet A, planet B, and also the in­formation of the spacecraft, “S.” The line stretched perpendicular across the tape represents the head device transmitting all exist­ence of the universe at the exact same moment in time.  Step 0 represents the beginning of the journey.  The straight line along the tape represents the position of “S” on the tape in its journey from A to B. Our observation now shows that time, in the first dimension, is the distance the tapehead has traveled across the information.  To avoid the problem of time and distance, we would have to raise the potential of spacecraft “S” to a level where it could no longer exist in this dimension.  When it reached this po­tential, it would be possible to move its information perpendicularly across the tape instead of along it.  The result would be that no time would pass for spacecraft “S” traveling from A to B. There may be some proof of this idea of high potential.  Many UFO sightings have been made all over the world and many have described various glowing lights around the surface of these UFOs.  The color most mentioned is a blue hue.  This blue hue around the UFO is defi­nitely high voltage.  Another proof of this idea is the many descrip­tions of radical turns performed at tremendous speeds.  If these UFO’s were entirely in this dimension, the laws of centrifugal force would be entirely valid for them.  Since it is obvious that the effects of centrifugal force have no bearing on their space, we must come to the conclusion that they are moving in time and space.

Measuring Rods and Clocks

The effects of velocity on three-dimensional objects and clocks is probably the best known effect resulting from the Special Theory of Relativity.  As an object increases its velocity toward the speed of light, its dimensions become smaller.  The equation used to cal­culate the size difference is quite simple

 

Lengths of objects    1- V2/C2      

Duration of time  = t/v2/c2

 

 

51

This is called the Lorentz transformations.  Let’s use the example of a rod one meter long.  If this rod was not moving at all in the fourth dimension, it would be one meter long.  Now let’s say the velocity is increased to 200 million meters per second.

 

 

At this velocity, the one-meter rod would be 74.5 centimeters long, or, in other words, it would be reduced in size to 74.5 percent of its original length.  If the velocity was further increased to 298 million meters per second,

 

 

the one-meter rod would now be 10.9 centimeters long.  As we can see, the rod is getting smaller as we approach the speed of light.  The inverse happens with time.  As the velocity of a clock increases, the time it measures slows down.  To give an example of this, let us use the same velocities as the previous example.  Wehave a clock moving through space at 200 million meters per second.

 

 

The outcome is that each second measured by that clock is actually 1.342 seconds long, as measured by a clock with 0 velocity.  If the speed is increased to 298 million meters per second,

 

 

the duration of one second is now 9.165 seconds long, as measured by another clock at zero velocity.  Einstein only explained how this

 

 

52

phenomenon could be calculated and that velocity caused this effect.  He never explained why velocity caused the phenomenon.

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

To explain how this phenomenon occurs, we must go back to the tape analogy.  Remember that the head device is going at the speed of light transmitting the information of all existence.  So that means that an object at absolute zero velocity in space is actually going (in the diehold) at the speed of light.  Another way of saying it is that the object’s information is being modulated into existence at the speed of light.  This means that to increase its speed, it is impossible to do it in the diehold; because it cannot go past the head device.

Our conclusion is that velocity or speed is only an observational fact for the other dimensions.

The next conclusion we must come to is that if we increase our velocity in the fourth dimension and if we accept the idea that we cannot go faster in the diehold (the first dimension), then the re­sult of our increased speed must be the stretching out of the in­formation.  To clarify this idea, let’s go to the illustration, (Figure 3.10). Object A has zero velocity in this dimension at Point 1. In the diehold its information is being modulated even with the head device.  At Step 2, let’s say the speed of the object A’ has been increased to 100 million meters per second.

 

Notice that Object A’s information has been stretched to 106.1 percent of its original modulation behind the head device.  The consequence of this is that one second measured on Object A’ would actually be 1.061 seconds long; and if Object A measured one meter long at rest, it would now measure 94.27 centimeters long.  In Einstein’s theory, the mass of the object would also be­come 6.075 percent greater as the size of the object became smaller.  Our reason for this is as the information of A’is stretched out, it

53

HEAD DEVICE AT TWO CONSECU IVE MOMENTS IN TIME

 

Figure 3. 10 Demonstrating the effects of velocity in the diehold

takes up a greater domain of information on the tape.  This greater domain of information is represented by the shaded area in the diagram.  This greater amount of information increases the gravita­tional field around the object because a larger domain of informa­tion must be moculated in the same size area in this dimension.  This increased field will compress the size of the original object. The end result is that the mass goes up and the volume goes down in the same proportion.

At position 2, the velocity of B is 298 million meters per second.

 

The result would be that the information for Object B would be stretched to 917 percent of its original modulation behind the tape­head.  This would be indicated by the fact that a clock placed on Object B would measure time 9.17 times slower than at rest.  The mass of Object B would be 917 percent greater than at rest be­cause Object B is occupying a much larger domain of information on the tape.  The increased field (information) would in turn re­duce the size of B to only 10.9 percent of its original volume.  As

54

we can see, as the velocity of A is increased A to A’, the area of domains of information for A’ becomes greater because the signal is getting stretched out increasingly behind the head device.  This in turn manifests itself by slowing down time for the object.  Since the domains of information for A’ are greater, the field becomes greater because more information must be modulated in a smaller area.  The increased gravitational field in turn reduces the volume of A’ proportionally.  This process would continue until the object reaches just under the speed of light.  The result of this fantastic speed is that the object is becoming a first-dimensional object.  It is returning to the information that made it up, where time is irrele­vant.  To get Object B to this fantastic velocity, it would take an equally fantastic amount of energy.  Therefore, this method of transportation is highly inefficient and wasteful.  We could more easily raise the potential of the object high enough and move the object in time and space using the diehold instead of going against it. In reality, we are really adding potential to an object when we use mechanical methods of propulsion in this dimension, but we are doing it the hard way-this is because we are using me­chanical energy from this dimension instead of using energy that is already in the diehold.

Inertia of Energy

Relativity-the most important principle developed from the Spe­cial Theory of Relativity is the proportionality of inertia and inertial mass.  This principle is called the Law of Inertia of Energy.  The formula for this law is probably the best known formula in science; that is, E=mc2 . The meaning of this equation is: energy is equal to the inertial mass of an object times the speed of light, squared.  The implication is that we can obtain energy from mat­ter.  In fact, Einstein said that matter is nothing more than concen­trated areas of energy.  The proof of his equation is generally accepted to be the atomic and hydrogen bombs.

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

To get right to the point, per our theory, the formula, E=mc2, is wrong, the philosophy is wrong, and the observation is wrong.

 

55

The first problem is that it assumes that everything from that reaction is happening in this dimension.  It does not take into ac­count the fact that matter has unique frequencies associated with it, and that these frequencies result from its information.  It does not explain why the speed of light is the constant of the universe, it merely recognizes that it is.  So c2 was put in the formula, which would, of course, produce a large answer.  In summary, all this formula (E=mc2) produces is a very large number that can’t be tested for its accuracy.  There is enough evidence today to show this formula is wrong in results and theory.  One such result is the amount of energy being emitted by quasars, billions of light years away.  The energy released is more than can be explained by this formula (astronomy chapter).  Another fact is the phantom-leaf effect of Kirlian photography.  In this example, an energy field is being produced from no matter (Kirlian photography chapter).

How come the atomic bomb works? The answer is, first of all, that we must recognize that there are two ways of raising the potential of matter (three-dimensional objects).  One is by using high voltage, high frequency.  This is the easiest way because we are using electrical potential that exists only in the diehold.  The other method is by using mechanical methods, which is less efficient.  The atomic and hydrogen bombs use this latter method.

Fission Reaction

Relativity explanation-This type of reaction is used in the atomic bomb.  The principle is rather simple.  The only difficult part is its implementation.  The basic principle is that we must take an un­stable element, such as uranium isotope (U235) and raise its po­tential above what scientists call the fission barrier, enabling the uranium to split into two more stable elements.  These elements usually form within the middle part of the periodic chart.  Scien­tists have estimated that the binding energy inside U235 is equiva­lent to 5 x 106 electron volts.  The idea is to get a highly excited proton with a kinetic energy of 13 x 106 volts in order to penetrate the U235  nucleus.  It is theorized by physicists that the additional potential added by this proton is the energy that splits the U235 molecule into two more stable elements.  Current scientific theory continues by saying that the energy released is the result of the

56

splitting apart of the U235.  The argument for this point is that the atomic weight of U235 is greater than the combined atomic weights of the end products.  They theorize that the difference in atomic weights is due to energy conversion.  It has been calculated that the equivalent voltage from one ounce of U235, resulting from fission, is 2 x 108 electron volts.  It has been correctly observed that the fission barrier of an element is greater (more difficult to obtain) from the lighter weight elements.  In fact, it has been found that all elements heavier than iron are potentially able to undergo fission.

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

What the scientists have described as causing a fission reaction is similar to our theory, but why the energy is observed in this di­mension is totally different.

First, the scientists are describing that they must take an un­stable element and raise its potential mechanically by bombarding it with a proton possessing 13 million volts in order to cause this reaction.  But, the raising of the potential does not split the U235 ­What this extra voltage or potential does is raise the potential of U235 to a point where it can no longer exist in this time and space.  Since the diehold cannot permit unstable areas to exist, it replaces the element U235 with the next most stable element or elements.  In this case, it was two elements with medium atomic weights.  We observe the explosion because the diehold cannot permit a tear or unstable part of the universe to exist.  When the U235’S potential has been sufficiently raised, it is then moved in time and space.  What is left in that space is an area in our dimension that has ab­solutely no information in it.  This small area is the ultimate in vacuums.  Once this tear develops in our dimension, the diehold senses it and begins to fill up that area with great quantities of information.  We observe it as a tremendous amount of heat and light; but in reality, it is the information that is making up the elements that will be occupying that time and space.  In short, the energy we see is the result of information rushing in to fill up a void in our dimension.

Another interesting fact discovered by the physicists was that all elements with atomic weights greater than iron could be fission-

57

able.  Remember iron is the only element in the universe that can become a magnet.  This tends to prove our point that the frequency for iron is very close to the carrier wave frequency.

Fusion

Relativity Explanation-Fusion is the result of two heavy hydrogen atoms being combined to form one helium atom.  What is used is deuterium, a heavy unstable hydrogen isotope possessing one pro­ton, one neutron, and an atomic weight of 2. A deuterium atom already has more potential than the average hydrogen atom.  The fusion reaction can be caused in a similar way as the fission reac­tion.  That is, we can take a highly accelerated proton possessing about 13 x 106 electron volts of potential and have it strike these deuterium atoms.  What is theorized is that the potential of the deuterium is increased, and two atoms are able to combine to be­come one helium atom.  The problem with bombarding heavy hy­drogen with protons is that the protons lose too much energy in the distance traveled, and the probability of hitting a deuterium atom is very small because of its small size.  So a spontaneous reac­tion is unlikely.  Because of this problem they had to apply kinetic energy (heat) amounting to at least 10 million degrees to start the fusion reaction.  Once the reaction starts, other isotopes of hydro­gen are produced, thereby raising the temperature to as high as 300 million degrees. (21) The higher the temperature, the greater the kinetic energy each hydrogen atom possesses, thereby increas­ing the rate of collisions amongst themselves.

The initial tremendous heat is provided by a fission reaction within the hydrogen bomb.  The scientists say that all the energy “released” by the hydrogen bomb is attributable to the atomic weight difference between two deuterium atoms and the final helium atom.  The deuterium atoms weigh more than the final helium atom.  Since a fusion reaction releases so much energy, scientists hope to control this reaction and hope to build a fusion reactor.  The problem they’re having is producing a magnetic bot­tle to contain this fusion reaction.  The temperature that must be produced is 108 degrees C (21) forming what is called a plasma.  The idea is to contain this plasma in a magnetic bottle for an ex­tended period of time.  The fuel they would use is heavy water,

58

which is abundant and inexpensive.  The problem they are having is that they cannot sustain the fusion reaction for more than a few microseconds before the energy leaks out of the magnetic bottle.  Scientists cannot seem to make the magnetic field strong enough to contain the reaction.

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

Per our theory, a fusion reaction is just like a fission reaction; the method of raising the potential of hydrogen is a little different.  The kinetic energy should really be looked on as vast amounts of potential that are imparted to the hydrogen atoms.  The potential of the hydrogen atom is increased so high that it can no longer exist in our time and space.  As mentioned in the previous section, the diehold cannot permit a tear or lack of information in our universe; so it must fill up that empty space with other informa­tion.  Since hydrogen is the lightest element, the diehold will have to fill up that void with the next most stable element, that element being helium.  The tremendous heat, light, and energy released from a fusion reaction is caused by this information rushing in to fill up that void in the universe.  The conclusion from our theory is that man will not be able to harness fusion power because he can never produce a magnetic bottle strong enough to prevent the diehold from rushing in information to fill up that space.  In fact, we could turn this entire planet into energy for that magnetic field and it still wouldn’t be enough energy to prevent the diehold from filling up that space in time.

The General Theory of Relativity

Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity was the first serious at­tempt to explain gravity since Newton.  Science knew that there was something very special about gravity, since it gave all falling objects uniform acceleration, regardless of mass.  In order for Ein­stein to come up with an acceptable theory for gravity, he felt he had to incorporate the phenomena of inertia and attraction in one theory.  One of the first premises he made was “electrostatic, mag­nostatic, and gravitational fields are all of different character.  They

59

do not mix.  Each preserves its own individuality, regardless of the others.” He came to this erroneous conclusion because he thought that Maxwell had explained what electromagnetism was and what caused a magnetic field, both in bar magnetism and in electric current.  As shown in the beginning of this chapter, Maxwell did nothing of the sort.  His equations attempted only to describe the effects of a magnetic field on the other objects.  If Einstein hadn’t made the assumption that electromagnetism and gravity were separate phenomena, then he couldn’t proceed in attempting to explain gravity as a function of intertial mass.  He knew it was im­possible to describe bar magnetism using his method and he should have realized that magnetism and gravity are the same phenomenon.  In order to proceed with his theory, he had to alter several assump­tions made in his Special Theory of Relativity.  He had to develop another system of coordinates to express the effects on objects by a gravitational field.  This system of coordinates would have to “transform rectilinear uniform motion of inertia into a curved, accelerated motion, which cannot be distinguished from one pro­duced by gravitation.” (3-p3l5) The system used Gaussian co­ordinates with geodetic lines to represent the curved space around the planet (Figure 3.11). This system of coordinates is very diffi­cult to work with involves a highly complicated system of differ­ential equations.  With this system of coordinates, “straight” and “curved” have less meaning than in classical mechanics.  Using this matrix system, gravity was explained as being cuased by the for­ward velocity of objects circling a fixed center of a planet (Figure 3.12). “Gravitational problems thus resolved into the general science of motion of a relativity theory of all motions.” (6-p48) By treat­ing gravitation and acceleration as equivalent events, he thought he was able to explain why all masses are equally attracted and accelerated to the center of a planet.  “The centrifugal field around a rotating body can be interpreted as a gravitational field, pro­duced by the revolution of all masses in the universe about the nonrotating body in question.” (6-p55) A popular example used to prove Einstein’s point that a gravitational field is really the effect of acceleration, is the example of an elevator not influenced by a gravitational field.  If a person is in this elevator traveling at a constant acceleration, the person cannot tell the difference be­tween this downward force or a downward gravitational field.  This acceleration, Einstein said, is similar to a person standing

60

V and U represents coordinates on a curved surface.  There are an infinite number of co­ordinates between V=l and V=2.

Figure 3.11 Drawing of Gaussian coordinates

on the earth.  He has a forward velocity due to the rotation of the earth.  The acceleration factor is curved downward toward the center of the earth.  This is a very general explanation of his theory of gravitation.  There are much more detailed explanations in other physics books, but further description and discussion of this im­probable theory will not make it any more correct.  If it does not seem to make any sense to you that acceleration is really what causes gravity, you aren’t alone.  The physicists who believed in relativity also knew it; but without this analogy, they knew that relativity would never explain the phenomenon of gravity.  To quote their line of reasoning: “Common sense often has the tend­ency to lead us astray.” (3-p346) (Max Born, 1924)

61

DIRECTION OF

GRAVITATION FORCE

 

 

Earth

Figure 3.12 Gravity described as curvalinear acceleration

 

If any man or group tells you not to use your own common sense or not to think, but to leave the thinking up to them, be immediately on your guard.  They don’t want you to think because they do not want to take the chance that someone will prove them wrong.  They also do not want you to evolve to the truth.  If you start to come to the truth by yourself, their purpose for existing is no longer needed.

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

There are so many things wrong with the General Theory of Relativity caused by erroneous assumptions and explanations that go

62

back to Maxwell, that it’s better to start from scratch and explain what gravity really is.

The first thing that made Einstein’s theory wrong was that he did not recognize that there are two fields associated with our planet.  One is the magnetic field (North and South Poles); and the other is the earth’s gravitational field.  The gravity is caused by the information of the physical planet being modulated and directed 360’ around a point in time and space.

The planet occupies a great amount of domains of information in the diehold.  This information modulates into mass 360’ around a specific point in time and space.  Any object that is within the vicinity of this planet will be “pushed” toward the center of this modulation point.  The force of attraction will observe the inverse square law developed by Newton.  The actual gravitational field or force does not really happen in this dimension.  The tremendous amount of information that is being directed to make up the planet pushes or bends the information that makes up any object that comes close.  The same effect will also happen to light.

To test this theory against Einstein’s, we had to see if gravity was affected by the velocity of the object around the exis of the earth, or was the gravity due to our theory.

Scientists measure the gravitational field of the earth in units called dynes.  They use devices called gravity meters to measure the gravity strength in different and varied parts of the world.  The system is called the Potsdam System.

The first test used was to see if gravity changed for short dis­tances at about the same elevation.  For this test, we compared the gravity values obtained by two submarine expeditions from Hol­land.  The first table of measurements is from the voyage of Hr.  Ms. K II, (Dutch designation for their submarines) 1923, from Holland to Sabang, via the Suez Canal.

The other table is from the voyage of the Hr.  Ms. KX III from Holland to Java, via the Panama Canal, 1926.

Notice from both tables that the gravity changes quite a bit for such a slow velocity.  It seemed that the location on the earth had more to do with the gravity measurement than did the velocity of the ships.  Next, we compared the gravity values for three different observational points on the earth (Figure 3.13). The first one was at Cape Perry, Canada (A) (approximately 70’ 10’north by 124’ west) with a gravity value of 982.633 dynes.

63

Date                        Location                                 Depth                                     Dynes

9/26           Holland            25M             979.911

10/4                                20M             979.879

10/6                                25M             979.997

10/7            Tunis                2M             979.928

10/15                                9m             979.742

10/17                               15M             979.545

10/18          Alexandria            2M             979.428

10/25                               12M             979.442

10/30          Suez                  2M             979.334

11/1                                15M             979.074

11/3                                15M             978.680

11/5                                15M             978.377

11/7           Aden                  2M             978.323

11/16                               15M             978.287

11/17                               15M             978.186

11/19                               20M             978.137

11/20                               20M             978.113

11/21                               20M             978.105

11/22                               20M             978.117

11/24                               20M             978.105

11/28          Colombo               2M             978.146

12/5                                20M             978.170

12/8                                15M             978.073

12/10                               20M             978.029

12/12          Sabang                2M             978.182

 

 

Location of Observation                                                                                      Dynes

    Holland                                         980.549

    Horta                                           980.163

    Las Palmas                                      979.390

    Curacao                                         978.435

    Panama                                          978.247

    Mazatlan                                        978.866

    San Francisco                                   980.000

    Honolulu                                        978.943

    Guam                                            978.542

    Yap                                             978.479

    Manilla                                         978.362

    Amboina                                         978.183

    Banda                                           978.275

    Bima                                            978.279

    Surabaya                                        978.138

 

64

 

Figure 3.13 Comparison of the gravity values at the poles and the equator

 

The next location was Manta, Ecuador, (B) 56’ south by approximately 81’ west with a gravity value of 978.1017 dynes. The third observational point was McMurdo Bay, Antarctica, © 77’ 53’ south by 165’ east with a gravity value of 982.9890 dynes.  The difference in gravity values between the North Pole and the equator or the South Pole and the equator should then be due to their velocity around the axis or their velocity around its neigh­boring space, if Einstein’s theory was correct.  The circumference covered by the observation point at Cape Perry was 13,739 kilo­meters (velocity equalling 159M/sec.). The observation point at McMurdo Bay was 8,397 kilometers in circumference (velocity

65

equalling 97M/sec.); and finally, the observational point on the equator was approximately 40,000 kilometers (velocity equalling 463M/sec.).

The question is: is the gravitational difference between the pole area and the equator due to their velocity differences and centri­fugal force? Using Einstein’s formula, we found that these veloci­ties caused a negligible difference in their weights.  In fact, if we considered the combined velocities of the object around the earth and its velocity around the sun (29.785M/sec.). The resultc would. still be negligible.  Even velocity at a higher altitude, as at Ipeales, Nirine, Chile (52’ north, elevation 9,680’, at 977.2532 dynes) did not have an appreciable effect on the gravitational weight.  The biggest deciding factors were the amount of mass under the gravity meter and the distance from the magnetic poles of the earth.

The gravity differences between the equator and the pole areas is about five dynes.  This large difference is not due to the object’s velocity in this dimension.  The gravitational effect is due entirely to the information that makes up this planet.  The daily fluctua­tions in gravity, as much as .035 dynes, are due to the changes in the modulation intensity of the information.  The reason gravity is stronger at the magnetic poles is because the carrier wave frequency along with the information that makes up other controlling fre­quencies of the earth is also being directed to those areas.  This additional information results in a greater “pushing” of any other information that is in its path, thereby causing a greater gravity.

Geomagnetism

This section is one of the most important in this book because it gives us our first major clue as to what happened on the earth many thousands of years ago and what will happen again.  This section also gives us the first major evidence that there is a plan and order in the universe.

Description of the Earth’s Magnetic Field

Traditional Theory-It may appear that the earth’s magnetic field is caused in the same manner as a bar magnet.  But scientists know

66

that the core of the earth is too hot to permit the existence of magnetized rock. (16-plll) Instead, they came up with the dynamo theory, which theorizes that the magnetic field is generated by convective motions in the liquid outer core of the earth. (9-p207)

One of the problems with this theory is that they can’t explain the source of the heat necessary and the process operating the geodynamo.  One reason is because all velocity fields that form toroidal fields cannot act as a dynamo. (9-p207) We would also add that it could not be this type of dynamo because we must assume that the core and the liquid outer core are perfectly cen­tered in the earth’s interior (Figure 3.14). The magnetic fields produced from this dynamo would have to be directly opposite each other.  But the magnetic poles of the earth are about a thou­sand miles closer together (North Pole, 75’ north, 101’ west; South Pole, 67’ south, 143’ east, approximately).

Multidimensional Reality Explanation

The first question that must be answered is what causes the heat in the core of the earth.  The traditional idea is that the earth was a molten mass some 4.6 billion years ago. (16) What is assumed is that the earth gradually cooled down forming a 2,900 Km thick mantle.  This mantle insulates the outer and inner core from heat loss.  The problem with this theory is that we don’t believe the mantle of the earth could have acted as such a good insulator for so many billions of years.  It is more probable that the earth would have cooled down several billion years ago and would not possess nearly the amount of heat potential that it now has.  The conclusion from this, is that the earth must have some sort of heat generating system in the center that is also related to its magnetic field.  Per our theory, the earth is formed by the modulation of a tremendous amount of information that makes up the planet.  This information modulates to a specific point in time and space.  This point we theorize is near the center of the earth.  It is not necessary that this modulation point be exactly in the center of the earth.  As discussed earlier, each element in the universe has its own specific frequency.  Since the planet is certainly made up of all the elements that are in the periodic table (92 natural elements), the vector modulation points of all these elements would be directed toward

67

 

Figure 3.14 Diagram of the interior of the earth

 

one finite area in the core.  Along with the frequencies of the ele­ments would be other clocking and synchronizing frequencies.  This idea is a very important one in terms of existence.  If we say the information that makes up these elements exists in a structure functioning like a computer, this computer would have to have clocked and synchronous logic systems in it.  The advantages of a clocked logic is that unchecked bits of information cannot run wildly through the circuit.  Instead, information can only progress one stage at a time.  The second advantage is that everything in the computer happens at about the same time, thereby eliminating race conditions, timing sequence mix-ups, and transient voltages.  In addition to clock frequencies there would also have to be syn­chronizer frequencies.  In computers, synchronizers are used to

68

align random outside wired commands and to get them to fit an exact time slot in a timing system. (15-p207) This timing system could be related to the number of electrons formed in one second.  Along with synchronizer pulses there would also be resynchronizer pulses.  Resynchronizer pulses would eliminate propagation delays of the information along with random voltage swings, also resyn­chronizing all bits of information to fit into the timing system of the computer. (15-p2l0) These different types of signals would be a much lower frequency than the information that makes up the elements.  It is unknown how many different clock and synchro­nizing frequencies there are in our existence, but there is a great deal of proof that they do indeed exist.  All these collective fre­quencies are being directed toward the center modulation point.  The carrier wave, clocking, and other synchronizing frequencies are what we see as the magnetic field of the earth.  The magnetic field, therefore, is not related to any of the elements but acts as a resynchronizing frequency, rising and falling in amplitude and changing polarity.  The heat comes about because this modulation point acts like a filament in an incandescent bulb.

The process is exactly like Nikola Tesla’s incandescent-button lamp (Figure 3.15). In this bulb, a carbon button is supplied with high voltage, high frequency current which charges the carbon button.  Charged particles are repelled at high velocity to the sur­rounding glass globe where the particles lose their charge.  They are then repelled back at an equally high velocity striking the button in the center.  This process occurs millions of times per second, thereby causing the carbon button to become heated to incandes­cence.  In such a bulb, tremendous temperatures are created.  If the current is increased, the temperature is in turn increased, thereby vaporizing the carbon into gas more quickly. (20)

Relating this invention to the core is not too difficult.  The mod­ulation point is like the carbon button; but unlike the lamp, the modulation point is not physically connected to any outside energy source.  The energy comes about from the modulation of all these frequencies.  As discussed earlier in the section on generators, as the information of an object is modulating into our existence, for one small moment of time just magnetic information is present.  Then 90’ out of phase is the potential produced by the changing field.  The potential produced by all this information produces the tre­mendous heat and a tremendous amount of voltage in the center.

69

 

Figure 3.15 Diagram of Nikola Tesla’s button lamp

This modulation point, just like the carbon button, starts emitting highly electrically charged particles, which in turn heat the surface of the outer core.  These particles then reverse their charge and direction heading back to the modulation point at tremendous velocities.  The diameter of the inner core is 2,780 kilometers, which in turn heats up the area called the outer core, which is 2,080 kilometers thick.  Therefore, our conclusion is that the center of the earth is not a solid, massive core but a super-heated, dense

70

gas plasma.  This plasma possesses a tremendous amount of un­tapped potential.  It may seem rather absurd that the center of the earth is not a solid core, but there is enough seismic evidence that the core is indeed not solid.  The proof is the following: (Figure 3.16) During an earthquake, the seismic waves travel at different velocities and at different angles depending on the medium the waves pass through.  As illustrated, the seismic waves that pass through each distinct layer of the earth are deflected in unique waves.  There are two kinds of waves produced by an earthquake, the primary wave (P wave) and the secondary wave (S wave).  The P wave travels faster than the S wave.  As shown by the diagram, the velocity of the S waves abruptly stop at the edge of the outer core, thereby indicating the difference in composition between the mantle, which is of a harder, more consistent material than the outer core, which is generally accepted to be quite liquid.  The P wave, on the other hand, travels increasingly faster to a velocity of about 14 kilometers a second when it gets to the lower region of the mantle.  When it reaches the outer core, it slows down to about 7.5 kilometers per second, then increases again in velocity to about 11 kilometers per second. (16-p92) The way seismolo­gists interpret these seismic velocities is that the reason why the P waves slow down when they reach the outer core is because the outer core is a fluid and does not transmit wave motion as fast as solids.  The reason why the P waves increase as they go toward the center is because the center again becomes a solid core.  The obvi­ous problem with this theory is: how do we explain the heat neces­sary to produce a liquid outer core, if the center is as cool as the mantle? It is much more logical to assume that the heat continues to get greater until it reaches its maximum in the center.  The reason the P waves start traveling faster in the inner core is because a gas plasma, under tremendous pressure, transmits wave motions as well as solids, and that is why the P waves increase in velocity toward the center.

Our conclusion is that the earth’s magnetic field is caused by a variety of frequencies which control the potential at the center.  The magnetic field is present without the necessity of any physical matter to be present.  The heat is produced by the modulation of many frequencies; frequencies, ranging from the information that makes up the different elements to various clocking, synchroniz­ing, and resynchronizing frequencies too numerous to comprehend and, perhaps, beyond our understanding.

71

 

E is the location of an earthquake in the crust of the earth. A-D is the paths of the seismic waves through the earth.

 

 

Figure 3.16 Diagram of seismic waves passing through the earth

 

 

72

 

Evidence of Synchronizing and Resynchronizing Frequencies

Ionosphere-The ionosphere is divided into four general layers. (Figure 3.17) The D, E, Fl, and F2 layers are ionized layers in the atmosphere.  Their best known function is radio transmission.  Each layer is capable of reflecting various radio signals back to the earth.  The reflection properties depend on the level of ionization of each layer.  It is unknown what causes these layers.  They are at the same altitude throughout the entire world, except at the polar regions.

 

Figure 3.17 Diagram of the ionosphere

The only other factor that affects the ionosphere is the sun spots, which raises the ionization of these layers.  We theorize that the cause of these layers is the modulation of the frequencies that make up the planet.  The reason there are multiple layers is similar to group waves produced by certain types of flourescent bulbs. (Figure 3.18) Under certain conditions, you can observe lightwaves in the tube of the bulb changing distance between peaks as the frequency of the cathode is changed.

73

 

Figure 3.18 Drawing of group waves

These sinusoidal light waves are called wave groups.  They are caused when two or more slightly different frequencies are moving in the same direction.  Sometimes their frequencies are in phase and sometimes they are not.  The result is that at certain intervals the individual frequencies amplify themselves, and at other inter­vals they cancel each other out.  These fluctuations are represented by Lines A and B of Figure 3.18. Each large bulge is called the beat wave.  It has a frequency equal to the difference of the other frequencies present.  Another observation of wave groups is that even in a disruptive medium, the wave groups are propagated over a considerable distance as a recognizable unit. (11-p937) Since the earth is not exactly like the flat plate of a cathode, as illustrated in Figure 3.18, the wave groups are formed uniformly all over earth except in the polar regions.  To us these wave groups would not form exactly as in the tube, but instead wave groups 1, 2, and 3 could be considered like the D, E, and F layers in our ionosphere.  These layers modulate at specific distances from the surface.  The earth can be considered like the cathode.  We theorize these iono­spheric layers are caused in a similar manner.  The layer above the ionosphere is called the plasmasphere (Figure 3.19). In this layer many low-frequency electromagnetic waves have been detected.  These frequencies range from .3 to 7.5 Mhz.

Scientists do not know what causes these low-electromagnetic frequencies.  They are so strong in some areas that any space vehicle passing through them can receive only those frequencies.  The max­imum strength of these frequencies is found along the magnetic equator of the earth, ranging from 2’ north to 2’ south. (16-p1O3) If you remember the discussion on current flowing through a wire, the electric field is formed perpendicular to the magnetic field.  As you can see by the illustration, the magnetosphere is also formed perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field; and the strongest part of this magnetosphere is exactly perpendicular to the magnetic field. (17) What causes these low electromagnetic

74

frequencies are the clocking, synchronizing, and resynchronizing frequencies that control the information that makes up the planet.

In addition to the previous frequencies mentioned, there are other even more interesting frequencies detected. (17, 18) These are ELF (Extra Low Frequency) hiss and chorus; VLF (Very Low Frequency) hiss, or discrete emissions; and LHR (Lower Hybrid Resonance) noise.  In some regions of the magnetosphere, these frequencies reach almost 100 percent of any of the signals heard in their vicinity.  No scientist knows what causes them nor how they are propagated.  The ELF and VLF noises have variable band widths and center frequencies and have not been extensively meas­ured.  The ELF noise or hiss is usually several hundred hertz wide and occurs below a 1000 hertz; the LHR hiss are waves linearly polarized along the magnetic field, which means that they are propagated perpendicular to the magnetic field.  Again we see the same similarity of an electric current passing through a wire

Figure 3.19 Diagram of the Van Allen belts

75

where the magnetic field appears perpendicular to the flow of current.  A variety of frequencies can be found from .3 to 100 Khz. (17) This hiss or noise from these three different types of frequen­cies is the function of the information directed toward the modu­lation point in the center of the earth.  This would include the information for all the elements that are on the earth.  The reason it sounds like a hiss or noise is because there are literally hundreds of different frequencies bundled together in a relatively narrow bandwidth.  All these frequencies heard in the upper atmosphere are a function of the information that makes up this planet.  The reason we hear them grouped at different frequencies is because we are hearing various harmonics of the original frequencies.

Magnetic Flucturations

Scientists have been monitoring the daily and seasonal magnetic fluctuations on the earth.  These magnetic fluctuations have been found at various wave lengths.  The wave lengths detected have usually been longer than the electromagnetic waves recorded in the ionosphere.  The lengths of some of these fluctuations have been daily, yearly, 5-year cycles, and 11-year cycles (Figure 3.20). The graphs included below show some of these magnetic fluctua­tions.  You will notice that they all take on the form of a sine wave.  This sine wave turns out to be a very important observation.  One of the most interesting listed below is the daily fluctuations (Fig­ure 3.21). On the chart, the X’ represents the magnetic field taken in a northerly direction.  The Y’ represents an east-west direction, and the Z’ represents the vertical direction.  The Z’ column proves our theory.  It plainly shows that the North Pole is 180’ out of phase with the South Pole.  No scientist has yet explained why this wave form exists.  This is why: The top of the graph represents the North Pole, and the bottom represents the South Pole.  As you can see, at 4:00 a.m. there is more information being directed toward the South Pole, At 12, noon, the information is of equal intensity.  At 17:00 (i.e., 5 p.m.) there is now more information being directed toward the North Pole. (19) This fluctuation of the magnetic field is due to the field being influenced by a synchro­nizing frequency.

76

 

Monthly mean departures from annual means, geomagnetic compomponent AX’, sun-spot minimum (1912-14, 1922-24) and maximum (1916-18, 1927-29) years (geomagnetic latitudes indicated in parentheses)

Successive overlapping five-year averages of monthly mean departures from annual means

Figure 3.20 Monthly, yearly and five year cycles of the magnetic fields of the earth

 

Polar Reversals

A polar reversal is when the magnetic field of the earth reverses itself so the north magnetic pole is where the south magnetic pole

 

77

 

Disturbance daily variation on disturbed days (SD), in various geomagnetic latitudes, geomagnetic components, August, 1922-33

*Note particularly that scales for graphs in auroral regions are different than for others

Figure 3.21 Daily variations in the magnetic intensity

 

was and vice-versa.  Geophysicists have been completely stymied in understanding why the poles of the earth have reversed them­selves at certain times in the past.  Many scientists believe this reversal phenomenon is related to their theory of a geodynamo.  As shown in the previous section, their geodynamo theory is incorrect.

78

The polar reversals are caused by a very long period, resynchroniz­ing frequency, whose half cycle is about 12,000 years.  When this frequency reaches the X axis (Figure 3.22), there is no magnetic field on the earth.  At this point, something very important hap­pens to this planet and in turn to man on it.  This moment in time is literally the most important time in man’s evolution.  This mo­ment in time happens all over the universe at exactly the same time.  This is because the information for all existence is in the die­hold, and this resynchronizing frequency is produced by the die­hold to eliminate all random noise, rippled delays, and other imperfections in the signal propagation.  The effect at this special time to other parts of the universe will be discussed in the chapter on astronomy.  The remainder of this chapter will be devoted to some of the effects that have happened and will happen on the planet when this “flip-flop” occurs.

Figure 3.22 Graph of the 12,000 year cycles

The first assumption that must be proved is how many years are between these cycles.  We theorize it is about 12,000 years.  The following is the proof for this assumption.

Scientists determine the direction of the magnetic polarity by examining the magnetic residue left in magnetized rocks and sediments.

79

First, we must see if there is a linear relationship between these reversal periods.  The lava-flows from the South Atlantic Ocean ridge have been studied for a distance of 1,500 kilometers perpen­dicular with the ocean ridge.  The results from these lava-flows clearly indicate the polar reversals have occured in equal time intervals.  It has been found that this linear relationship exists all over the world on the ocean floors. (16-pl48-9) Another study using potassium argon techniques for dating volcanic sediments also indicates that all polar reversals were of nearly equal lengths. (10) The estimate as to the length of time between reversals vary from 100,000 years to one million. (10) These estimates are considerably longer than ours, but this is due to the problems they have obtaining short interval estimates.  First, let’s look at the method of dating.  They rely heavily on the data obtained from the amount of sediment obtained between reversals.  They assume that certain sediments and volcanic spreading are deposited evenly over the time between reversals.  As we will show later, this assumption is inaccurate.  What does happen is that there is more sediment and volcanic activity during the reversal time than during the period between reversals.

            Dating sediments for periods shorter than 30,000 years is very difficult because the magnetic artifact is below the level of experi­mental noise, so shorter periods have not been conclusively resolved using magnetic profiles. (10-p242) Variations in the rate of sedimen­tation, noise due to stratigraphic gaps, authigenic chemical changes in the ferromagnetic minerals, and the effects by organisms have also made dating short events very difficult. (10-p243; 19-p378)

            In summary, none of the above evidence rules out the occur­rence of short-term reversals.  It merely says that it is very difficult to detect them.

 

Evidence

The next step in proving the possibility of 12,000-year reversals is to see if there is any evidence of a reversal 12,000 years ago.  There is plenty!

Core samples from the Gulf of Mexico, Northern and Central Europe, Eastern Canada, and New Zealand have been found to have large-scale magnetic fluctuations dating from about 12,500

80

years ago. (13-p48) Besides this date, intervals of 24,000 - 25,000 years and 38,000 - 40,000 years have also been indicated.  The 24,000 - 25,000 year-dates were the only ones that could be cor­related as a world-wide fluctuation. (13-p49) We can plainly see that the above dates are multiples of 12,000 years.

Lake Michigan Sediments

It has been determined by carbon-14 dating that the sediment deposited by the last ice age is 11,500 years old. (11-p531) At the bottom of this sediment is the base of a Lake Michigan formation.  The magnetic evidence at the base indicates a polar reversal and a westward shift in the magnetic pole. (11-p538)

Wisconsin

The Valderan Till by Lake Michigan also indicates the same mag­netic fluctuation as the above example.  The Valderan Till has been dated to be between 11,140 and 12,900C14 years old.  The gen­erally accepted date is 11,500C14 years old. (11-p533)

Lake Windermere, England

A magnetic fluctuation has been found at the base of the lake sediments.  The date of these sediments is believed to be 15,400 years ±2,800 years.  The magnetic data also indicates a westwardly shift in the magnetic pole. (11-p531)

Lake Erie

The glacial deposits on the north shore of Lake Erie have been examined along a distance of 100 kilometers.  The core samples indicate a polar reversal and a westward polar movement to its present location. (12-pl4l-3) The age of this glacial till, known as the Port Stanley Till, is about 11,000 years old, which is the time of the last ice age.  It was also found that this till was deposited

81

over a much shorter period of time than previously assumed (300 years, ±200). (12-pl43)

Northwestern Shore of Lake Ontario

Near Toronto, Canada, more than 300 test cores were taken in the glacial sediments.  The remnant magnetization indicated a polar reversal just before the last ice age.  It also found, with a 99 percent confidence, that there was a westwardly polar movement to its present position. (14-pl233-6)

The previous examples are excellent evidence that a polar re­versal occurred about 11,700 years ago and preceded the sediments left from the last ice age.  We will explain in the chapter on astron­omy what causes the ice age and why it occurs after a polar reversal.

The last unanswered phenomenon is: why do the magnetic poles of the earth wander or wobble? It has been theorized that it takes a decade for this process to happen. (9) The Port Stanley Till in Ontario indicates that the magnetic North Pole was previ­ously located at a latitude of 74.7° N., longitude 78.2° E. There is a 95 percent confidence rate that the pole was located within a radius of 800 kilometers of this point. (12-pl41) The till near Ontario, Canada, indicates a location of latitude 71.8° N. (±8.6°), longitude 83.8° E. (±13.7°), with a 99 percent confidence. (14 ­pg l, 233) Many of the test holes from the Lake Windermere loca­tion indicate the previous polar location to be in about the same area. (11-p538)

The Reversal Period

Geophysicists cannot seem to understand why the magnetic poles would reverse themselves.  This is because they don’t know what magnetism or gravity is, so they would have no idea that the field reverses itself because of something that happens in another dimension.  The reason the magnetic pole shifts to the west is be­cause the rotation of the earth is dependent on the magnetic field of the earth.  As the reversal period approaches, the magnetic field begins to collapse quite rapidly and the rotation begins to slow

82

down.  However, during this period the rotation rate lags the mag­netic decay by some time. (22) When the X axes is crossed and zero field is obtained the earth continues to rotate for a short period of time.  If we take into consideration the location of the last magnetic North pole we would conclude the period of time of continued rotation is about half a day before the earths rotation completely stops.  After the X axes has been crossed, the earth would slowly begin to rotate in the opposite direction. It is important to the subject that we describe what happens when a polar reversal occurs.

A.  Years before the reversal occurs, the earth’s ionosphere, plasmasphere, and Van Allen belts will become super-charged with potential.  This is because these upper layers are like a capacitor that has been charged up due to the magnetic field.  As the mag­netic field collapses, the capacitor releases its potential.  During this period of time, the jet streams in the upper atmosphere would change direction by many thousands of miles.

In addition to the jet stream moving horizontally in its plane, it can also move vertically.  This means that the jet stream could come down to a few thousand feet above the surface of the earth.  This condition would be caused when the upper atmospheric layers (D, E, and F layers) become overcharged with an excess of electrons.  The jet stream moving at great velocities would also acquire the same sign charge (the same positive charge).  When this condition happens, the jet stream will be repelled from the iono­sphere down toward the earth, which would be considered negatively charged. It is possible that as the ionosphere becomes charged to its maximum, the jet stream could be lowered to sea level.

B. A similar process would be occuring in the center of the earth. As the magnetic field is collapsing, the potential at the inner core will start to increase.  As the potential increases, (Figure 3.23) it will be converted into additional heat that will be transferred through the mantle of the earth.  As the mantle heats up, it will cause many more earthquakes and volcanoes.  The increased earth­quake activity is additionally caused by the decreasing magnetic field of the earth.  It has been estimated that the magnetic field amounts to only about two percent of the force holding the con­tinental plates in place. (16-pl03) Personally, we feel it is greater than this; but even if it is only two percent, it may be enough to

83

prevent a plate from moving.  As the magnetic field diminishes, the plates are under greater influences of the increasing convection currents of lava in the mantle.  If the mantle pressure changes under a large land mass, that continent could rise or fall.  This could have been the process that caused the continent of Atlantis to sink.

 

M = Magnetic field strength

E = Electrical potential in the center of the earth

 

Figure 3.23 Graph of the 12,000 year cycles with the potential created by the collapsing field

 

C.         When the actual zero magnetism point is reached (the re­versal), there will be a release of all the tremendous potential stored up in the ionosphere and the layers above.  This release would be in the form of a tremendous lightning storm lasting the duration of the reversal.  This lightning storm would be like noth­ing we have seen before.

D.        The inner core would also release a tremendous spike of potential that would probably also turn the outer core into a gas plasma carrying an electric charge many millions of times greater than the atmosphere.  We can view At this charge as being infi­nite for all practical purposes.  On the surface of the earth there

 

84

would be tremendous earthquakes and large earth movements, along with even more volcanoes and lava flows.

Some of these predictions may seem very far out; but in Chapter 11 we will explore some of the mythologies from all over the world which tell a story strikingly similar to our assumptions.  In Chapter 12 we will try to estimate when it will happen again, and it will happen again, since there is proof that it has occurred for over a billion years. (16-pl26)

REFERENCES

1 .    Einstein, A., “Relativity, The Special and General Theory” (N.Y., Crown Publ., 1961).

2.             Purcell, E. M., “Electricity and Magnetism-Berkeley Physics Course; Vol. 2” (N.Y., McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1965).

3.             Born, Max, “Einsteins Theory of Relativity, Rev.  Ed.” (N.Y., Dover Publ., 1965).

4.             Maxwell, James C., “A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed.” (Oxford, Claredon Press, 1904).

5.             Einstein, A. & Infeld, L., “The Evolution of Physics” (N.Y., Simon & Schuster, 1938).

6.             Freundlich, E. F., “The Foundations of Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation” (London, Methuen, 1924).

7.             Blitzer, R., “Basic Electricity for Electronics” (N.Y., John Wiley & Sons, 1975).

8.             Faraday, Michael, “Experimental Researches in Electricity, vol. 3” (London, R & J. E. Taylor, 1855).

9.             Bussee, F. H., “Core Motions and the Geodynamo: Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics,” vol. 13, no. 3; July 1975.

10.           Cox, A., “Geomagnetic Reversals: Science,” vol. 163, no. 3864, Jan. 17, 1969.

 

 

85

11.           Creer, K., Gross, D. L., Lineback, J. A., Origin of Regional Geomagnetic Variations by Wisconsin & Holocene sediments from Lake Michigan & Lake Windermere, England: Geological Society of America, bulletin, vol. 87, p. 531-540; April 1976.

12.           Stupavsky, M., Symons, T. A., Gravenor, P., Paleomagnetism of the Port Stanley Till, Ontario: Geological Society of America, bulletin, vol. 85, p. 141-144, Jan. 1974.

13.           Verosub, K. L., Paleomagnetic Excursions as Magnetostrati­graphic Horizons, A Cautionary Note: Science, vol. 190,

p.     48-50, June 12, 1975.

14.           Stupavsky, M., Symons T. A., & Gravenor, P., Palemagnetism & Magnetic Fabric of the Leaside & Sunnybrook Tills near Toronto, Ontario: Geological Society of America, bulletin, vol. 85, p. 1233-1236, Aug. 1974.

15.           Lancaster, D., “TTL Cookbook” (Indianapolis, Howard W. Sams & Co., 1974).

16.           Wyllie, P. J., “The Way the Earth Works” (N.Y., John Wiley & Sons, 1976).

17.           Russell, C. T., McPherron, R. L., Coleman, P. J., Fluctuating Magnetic Field in the Magnetosphere: Space Science Reviews, vol. 12, p. 810-856, 1972.

18.           McPherron, R. L., Russell, C. T., Coleman, P. J., Fluctuating Magnetic Fields in the Magnetosphere: Space Science Re­views, vol. 13, p. 411-454, 1972.

19.           Vestine, E. H., et.al., “The Geomagnetic Field, Its Descrip­tion and Analysis” (Carnegie Institute of Washington, D.C., 1947).

20.           Martin, T. C., “The Inventions, Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla” (N.Y., The Electrical Engineer, 1894).

21.           The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 13 (Chicago, Helen Hemingway Benton, Publ., 1974).

22.           Ball, R. H., et.al., “Variations in the Geomagnetic Field and in the rate of the Earths rotation” (Santa Monica, The Rand Corp., Memorandum no.  RM-5717-PR, Oct. 1968).

 

86

Bibliography

Arantes, D. S., Scarabucci, R. R., Full-wave Analysis & Coupling Effects in a Crossover Region, Radio Science, vol. 1 0, no. 8, 9, p. 810-811, Sept. 1975.

Bain, W. C., Rishbeth, H., Developments in Ionospheric Physics since 1957, The Radio & Electronic Engineer, vol. 45, no. ½, Jan. & Feb. 1975.

Burton, R. K., McPerron, R. L., and Russel, C. T., The Terrestrial Magnetosphere: A Half wave rectifier of the Interplanetary Electrical Field, Science, vol. 189, p. 717-18, Aug. 29, 1975.

Cox, A., The Frequency of Geomagnetic Reversals and the Sym­metry of the Nondipole Field, Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, vol. 13, no. 3, July, 1975.

Einstein, A., The Meaning of Relativity, 2nd ed. (N.J., Prinston University Press, 1945).

Einstein, A., The Origins of the General Theory of Relativity-Lecture to the University of Glasgow, June 20, 1933.

Johnson, J. R., Electric Circuits, Part 1-Direct Current (N.Y., Rinehart Press, 1970).

Jones, M. R., Georges, T. M., Infrasound from Convective Storms III.  Propagation to the Ionosphere, Journal Acoust.  Soc. of America, vol. 59, no. 4, April, 1976.

Perona, G. E., LF & VLF Phase Antinomies During Solar X-ray Flares, Radio Science, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 435-444, April 1975.

Ruderman, M. A., Foley, H. M., Eleven year Variation in Polar Ozone and Stratospheric-Ion Chemistry, Science, vol. 192, p. 555-557, May 7, 1’976.

Weinberg, S., Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles & Applica­tions of the General Theory of Relativity (N.Y., John Wiley & Sons, 1972).

87